Systematic analyzing a five- miRNA panel and its diagnostic value of plasma expression in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Aberrant expression of miRNAs have been implicated in cancers, but the role of miRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains need to be elucidated. This study aimed to identify miRNAs that related to colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis and determine the diagnostic value. METHODS: Three GEO datasets (GSE128449, GSE35602 and GSE49246) with 131 samples were used to screen miRNAs that differential expression between tumor and control tissues. The expression of the identified miRNAs was validated in 50 clinical tissue samples and the GSE35834 dataset. The clinical significance of these miRNAs was analyzed in the TCGA dataset and clinical tissue samples. The expression of miRNAs in tissues and plasma samples were tested by RT-PCR assay in clinical samples, and their diagnostic value was determined. RESULTS: The analysis of three GEO datasets revealed that miR-595 and miR-1237 were upregulated, while miR-126, miR-139, and miR-143 were downregulated in CRC tissues compared to control tissues. The differential expression of the five miRNAs in CRC tissues was confirmed using clinical tissue samples and GEO databases. There was no significant correlation between the TNM stage and tumor stage of CRC and any of the five miRNAs. Plasma expression of the miRNAs differed significantly between CRC and non-cancer patients, and each miRNA had moderate diagnostic value for CRC. Combining the five miRNAs provided better diagnostic potential for CRC than a single miRNA. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that five miRNAs were related to the pathogenesis of CRC, but independent of the stage of CRC; Plasma expression of these miRNAs have moderate diagnostic value, and combination of these miRNAs showed better diagnostic ability in CRC.

Prognostic value of peripheral blood natural killer cells in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The association between natural killer (NK) cells and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic value of peripheral blood NK cells in CRC patients. METHODS: A total of 447 CRC patients who underwent radical surgery and chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic indicators. Correlation between NK cell percentage and other clinicopathological features (gender, age, histological grade, tumor stage, immune cells, and inflammatory indicators) was analyzed. The prognostic values of the combinations of NK cell percentage and other clinicopathological features were also determined. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that NK cell percentage in the peripheral blood was an independent prognostic indicator in CRC patients. A higher percentage of NK cells indicated a longer survival time than a lower percentage. NK cell percentage was positively correlated to the T and B lymphocyte counts and negatively correlated to the patients' age and albumin levels. With an area of 0.741 under a receiver operating characteristic curve, NK cells have a moderate predictive value for 3rd-year survival in CRC. This area increased to 0.851 by combining NK cell percentage with the B lymphocyte count. Elderly patients and those at an advanced clinical stage presented a lower percentage of NK cells than younger patients and those at an early clinical stage. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that NK cells in the blood were an independent predictor of survival in CRC patients, and the combined count of NK cells and B lymphocytes could increase the prognostic value.

Impact of primary colorectal Cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) originating from the right-sided or left-sided colon is distinct clinicopathological entity. The KRAS status and its prognostic value in CRC remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association of KRAS status with clinicopathological features and prognostic value in CRC. METHODS: 178 colon cancer and 145 rectal cancer patients were enrolled. KRAS mutation test was performed on paraffin-embedded tumor samples using PCR methods. The colon cancer was divided into right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Studies that reported the association of KRAS mutation with CRC clinical features and prognosis in databases were searched prior to 2018. The data of the present study was combined with the data of published studies using meta-analysis methods. RESULTS: No significant difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer regarding the KRAS status. The KRAS mutation was much frequent in RCC than in LCC (p = 0.010). 17 studies with 11,385 colon cancer patients were selected, the pooled results of our data and previous published data showed that KRAS mutation was more frequent in RCC compared with in LCC (p < 0.01); KRAS mutation was not associated with the prognosis in RCC patient; however, KRAS mutation indicated a poor prognosis in LCC patients compared with KRAS wild type (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: KRAS status has no difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer. KRAS mutation was more frequent in RCC than in LCC, and associated with a poor prognosis in LCC patients, but not in RCC patients.